Compliance Reports

When Financial Stewardship Is Presented as Impact: A Baseline Failure in Animal Welfare Claims

Public-facing claims by charitable organizations often combine financial stewardship, programmatic activity, and mission language into a unified narrative of impact. ...

When a Climate Metric Is Rejected Without Replacement: Baseline Failure in Public Claims of Progress

A widely circulated statement attributed to Bill Gates asserts that “temperature is not the best way to measure our progress ...

Aspirational Equity and the Limits of Interpretability: A Disclosure Analysis of UNICEF India’s “Fair Start” Claim

The statement that “every child deserves a fair and equal chance in life, irrespective of caste, ethnicity, gender, poverty, region ...

Aspirational Impact Claims and the Problem of Interpretability: Evaluating Yale Law School’s Animal Law Program Statement

Public-facing institutional claims about “impact” often operate at a high level of abstraction, particularly in academic settings where programs combine ...

Baseline Ambiguity and Outcome Inflation in Corporate Sustainability Narratives: The Coca-Cola “Better Shared Future” Claim

This report applies Zero Baseline Method (ZBM), evaluating whether minimum conditions of protection and political equity are met before assessing ...

Gucci’s “32% Reduction” Claim and the Problem of Climate Disclosure Without an Interpretable Baseline

Gucci’s statement that it achieved a “32% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2 and 3)” is a public-facing ...

Unbounded Claims and Undefined Baselines: Evaluating the “Good for Everyone” Assertion in Animal Law Advocacy

A public-facing statement associated with Harvard Law School’s animal law programming asserts that the initiative is “trying to prove that ...

Intensity Without Context: Why JBS’s Emissions Claim Fails a Disclosure Standard

JBS USA presents a claim that its greenhouse-gas emissions “intensity” was reduced by 20 percent between a 2015 baseline and ...

Baseline Ambiguity and Outcome Inflation in Peer Review Capacity Claims: An Analysis of IOP Publishing’s “19% Expansion” Statement

Corporate sustainability communications increasingly rely on broad, values-oriented language to describe positive social and environmental impact. A representative example appears ...

When “91% Lower” Is Not Self-Explanatory: Baseline Compression and Interpretability in Plant-Based Meat Impact Claims

The claim that “plant-based meat has, on average, 91% lower impacts than beef, 88% lower impacts than pork, and 71% ...

Seen something questionable?

Submit a published public impact claim for review. Provide the URL where the claim appears, paste the exact claim sentence, and include any sources the claim relies on, or write none stated. If the evidence is not public, provide a contact email and clear steps for an independent reviewer to request access.